HC Verma Chapter 30 Problem 15 – Flux Through Face of Cube with Charge at Edge

Problem Statement

A charge $q$ is placed at the midpoint of one edge of a cube. Find the flux through each face of the cube.

Given Information

  • All quantities, constants, and constraints stated in the problem above
  • Physical constants used as needed (see Concepts section)

Physical Concepts & Formulas

This problem draws on fundamental physical principles. The key is to identify which conservation law or field equation governs the system, then apply it systematically. Dimensional analysis can always be used to verify that the final answer has the correct units. Working from first principles — rather than memorising formulas — builds deeper understanding and allows tackling novel problems.

  • Identify the relevant physical law (Newton’s laws, conservation of energy/momentum, Maxwell’s equations, etc.)
  • State the mathematical form of that law as it applies here
  • Check dimensions at every step: both sides of an equation must have the same units

Step-by-Step Solution

Problem Statement

A charge $q$ is placed at the midpoint of one edge of a cube. Find the flux through each face of the cube.

Given Information

  • All quantities, constants, and constraints stated in the problem above
  • Physical constants used as needed (see Concepts section)

Physical Concepts & Formulas

This problem draws on fundamental physical principles. The key is to identify which conservation law or field equation governs the system, then apply it systematically. Dimensional analysis can always be used to verify that the final answer has the correct units. Working from first principles — rather than memorising formulas — builds deeper understanding and allows tackling novel problems.

  • Identify the relevant physical law (Newton’s laws, conservation of energy/momentum, Maxwell’s equations, etc.)
  • State the mathematical form of that law as it applies here
  • Check dimensions at every step: both sides of an equation must have the same units

Step-by-Step Solution

Problem Statement

A charge $q$ is placed at the midpoint of one edge of a cube. Find the flux through each face of the cube.

Concepts Used

  • Symmetry: charge at midpoint of an edge is shared by 4 cubes

Step-by-Step Solution

Step 1: A charge at the midpoint of an edge is shared equally among 4 cubes (each cube occupies one quadrant around that edge).

Step 2: Total flux through all surfaces of one cube: $q/(4\varepsilon_0)$.

Step 3: By the edge geometry, 2 faces of the cube contain the edge (flux = 0 through those, since field lines are parallel to them). The remaining 4 faces share the flux equally:
$$\Phi_{face} = \frac{q}{4\varepsilon_0\times4}\cdot4 = \frac{q}{16\varepsilon_0}$$

Answer

$$\boxed{\Phi_{each\ of\ 4\ non-adjacent\ faces} = \frac{q}{16\varepsilon_0},\quad \Phi_{2\ adjacent\ faces} = 0}$$

Worked Calculation

Substituting all given numerical values with their units into the derived formula:

$$\text{Numerical result} = \text{given expression substituted with values}$$

Answer

$$\boxed{\boxed{\Phi_{each\ of\ 4\ non-adjacent\ faces} = \frac{q}{16\varepsilon_0},\quad \Phi_{2\ adjacent\ faces} = 0}}$$

Physical Interpretation

The answer should be checked for dimensional consistency and physical reasonableness: is the magnitude in the expected range for this type of problem? Does the answer change in the correct direction when parameters are varied (e.g., increasing mass should increase momentum, increasing distance should decrease field strength)? These sanity checks are as important as the calculation itself.

Worked Calculation

Substituting all given numerical values with their units into the derived formula:

$$\text{Numerical result} = \text{given expression substituted with values}$$

Answer

$$\boxed{\boxed{\boxed{\Phi_{each\ of\ 4\ non-adjacent\ faces} = \frac{q}{16\varepsilon_0},\quad \Phi_{2\ adjacent\ faces} = 0}}}$$

Physical Interpretation

The answer should be checked for dimensional consistency and physical reasonableness: is the magnitude in the expected range for this type of problem? Does the answer change in the correct direction when parameters are varied (e.g., increasing mass should increase momentum, increasing distance should decrease field strength)? These sanity checks are as important as the calculation itself.


Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *