Problem 5.178 — Mueller Matrix for Polarizer

Problem Statement

Write the Mueller matrix for an ideal linear polarizer with transmission axis at $\theta = 0°$ (horizontal), and find the Stokes vector of the output when the input is $(S_0, S_1, S_2, S_3) = (1, 0, 0, 0)$ (unpolarized).

Given Information

  • See problem statement for all given quantities.

Physical Concepts & Formulas

This problem applies fundamental physics principles to the scenario described. The solution requires identifying the relevant conservation laws and equations of motion, then solving systematically with careful attention to units and sign conventions.

  • See the step-by-step solution for the specific equations applied.
  • All quantities are in SI units unless otherwise stated.

Step-by-Step Solution

Step 1 — Identify given quantities and set up the problem: Mueller matrix for horizontal polarizer:

Step 2 — Apply the relevant physical law or equation: $$M_H = \frac{1}{2}\begin{pmatrix}1&1&0&0\\1&1&0&0\\0&0&0&0\\0&0&0&0\end{pmatrix}$$

Step 3 — Solve algebraically for the unknown: Output Stokes vector:

Step 4 — Substitute numerical values with units: $$\mathbf{S}_{out} = M_H\begin{pmatrix}1\\0\\0\\0\end{pmatrix} = \frac{1}{2}\begin{pmatrix}1\\1\\0\\0\end{pmatrix}$$
$$\boxed{\text{Output: }I = I_0/2,\text{ horizontally polarized}}$$

Worked Calculation

$$M_H = \frac{1}{2}\begin{pmatrix}1&1&0&0\\1&1&0&0\\0&0&0&0\\0&0&0&0\end{pmatrix}$$

$$\mathbf{S}_{out} = M_H\begin{pmatrix}1\\0\\0\\0\end{pmatrix} = \frac{1}{2}\begin{pmatrix}1\\1\\0\\0\end{pmatrix}$$

$$\boxed{\text{Output: }I = I_0/2,\text{ horizontally polarized}}$$

Mueller matrix for horizontal polarizer:

$$M_H = \frac{1}{2}\begin{pmatrix}1&1&0&0\\1&1&0&0\\0&0&0&0\\0&0&0&0\end{pmatrix}$$

Output Stokes vector:

$$\mathbf{S}_{out} = M_H\begin{pmatrix}1\\0\\0\\0\end{pmatrix} = \frac{1}{2}\begin{pmatrix}1\\1\\0\\0\end{pmatrix}$$
$$\boxed{\text{Output: }I = I_0/2,\text{ horizontally polarized}}$$

Answer

$$\boxed{\text{Output: }I = I_0/2,\text{ horizontally polarized}}$$

Physical Interpretation

The numerical answer is physically reasonable — matching expected orders of magnitude and dimensional analysis. The result confirms the theoretical prediction and provides quantitative insight into the system’s behaviour.


Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *