Problem 6.55 — Photoelectron Maximum Speed from Potassium

Problem Statement

Solve the kinematics problem: Find maximum speed of photoelectrons from K ($\phi = 2.25$ eV) at $\lambda = 200$ nm. $$T_{max} = 1240/200 – 2.25 = 6.20 – 2.25 = 3.95 \text{ eV} = 6.32\times10^{-19} \text{ J}$$ $$v_{max} = \sqrt{2T_{max}/m_e} = \sqrt{2\times6.32\times10^{-19}/9.109\times10^{-31}} = 1.18\times10^6 \text{ m/s}$$

Given Information

  • All quantities, constants, and constraints stated in the problem above
  • Physical constants used as needed (see Concepts section)

Physical Concepts & Formulas

This problem draws on fundamental physical principles. The key is to identify which conservation law or field equation governs the system, then apply it systematically. Dimensional analysis can always be used to verify that the final answer has the correct units. Working from first principles — rather than memorising formulas — builds deeper understanding and allows tackling novel problems.

  • Identify the relevant physical law (Newton’s laws, conservation of energy/momentum, Maxwell’s equations, etc.)
  • State the mathematical form of that law as it applies here
  • Check dimensions at every step: both sides of an equation must have the same units

Step-by-Step Solution

Problem Statement

Solve the kinematics problem: Find maximum speed of photoelectrons from K ($\phi = 2.25$ eV) at $\lambda = 200$ nm. $$T_{max} = 1240/200 – 2.25 = 6.20 – 2.25 = 3.95 \text{ eV} = 6.32\times10^{-19} \text{ J}$$ $$v_{max} = \sqrt{2T_{max}/m_e} = \sqrt{2\times6.32\times10^{-19}/9.109\times10^{-31}} = 1.18\times10^6 \text{ m/s}$$

Given Information

  • Initial velocity $u$ (or $v_0$)
  • Acceleration $a$ (constant unless stated otherwise)
  • Time $t$ or distance $s$ as given

Physical Concepts & Formulas

Kinematics describes motion without reference to its cause. For constant acceleration, the four SUVAT equations are sufficient to solve any problem. They follow directly from the definitions of velocity ($v = ds/dt$) and acceleration ($a = dv/dt$). For 2D problems (projectile motion), the horizontal and vertical motions are independent — horizontal: constant velocity; vertical: constant acceleration $g$ downward. Relative motion problems require defining a reference frame explicitly and using vector subtraction.

  • $v = u + at$
  • $s = ut + \tfrac{1}{2}at^2$
  • $v^2 = u^2 + 2as$
  • $s = \tfrac{1}{2}(u+v)t$
  • Range of projectile: $R = \dfrac{u^2\sin 2\theta}{g}$
  • Max height: $H = \dfrac{u^2\sin^2\theta}{2g}$

Step-by-Step Solution

Step 1 — List knowns and unknown: $u$, $v$, $a$, $s$, $t$ — identify which three are known.

Step 2 — Choose the SUVAT equation that contains the unknown and all three known quantities.

Step 3 — Substitute and solve algebraically.

Step 4 — For 2D: Decompose $\vec{u}$ into $u_x = u\cos\theta$, $u_y = u\sin\theta$. Solve $x$ and $y$ separately.

Worked Calculation

Substituting all values with units:

Projectile at $u = 20\,\text{m/s}$, $\theta = 30°$:

$$R = \frac{u^2\sin 2\theta}{g} = \frac{400\times\sin 60°}{9.8} = \frac{400\times0.866}{9.8} = \frac{346.4}{9.8} \approx 35.3\,\text{m}$$

$$H = \frac{u^2\sin^2\theta}{2g} = \frac{400\times0.25}{19.6} = \frac{100}{19.6} \approx 5.1\,\text{m}$$

Answer

$$\boxed{R = \dfrac{u^2\sin 2\theta}{g},\quad H = \dfrac{u^2\sin^2\theta}{2g}}$$

Physical Interpretation

Maximum range occurs at $\theta = 45°$ where $\sin 90°=1$. The complementary angles $30°$ and $60°$ give the same range — a 20 m/s ball at either angle reaches ~35 m. Athletes intuitively throw at 45° for distance. The horizontal range is quadratic in $u$, so doubling the speed quadruples the range.

Worked Calculation

Substituting all given numerical values with their units into the derived formula:

$$\text{Numerical result} = \text{given expression substituted with values}$$

Answer

$$\boxed{\boxed{R = \dfrac{u^2\sin 2\theta}{g},\quad H = \dfrac{u^2\sin^2\theta}{2g}}}$$

Physical Interpretation

The answer should be checked for dimensional consistency and physical reasonableness: is the magnitude in the expected range for this type of problem? Does the answer change in the correct direction when parameters are varied (e.g., increasing mass should increase momentum, increasing distance should decrease field strength)? These sanity checks are as important as the calculation itself.


Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *